diff --git a/schule/englisch/EN_2025-02-06.typ b/schule/englisch/EN_2025-02-06.typ
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..90b7827
--- /dev/null
+++ b/schule/englisch/EN_2025-02-06.typ
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+#import "@preview/grape-suite:1.0.0": exercise
+#import exercise: project
+
+#set text(lang: "en")
+
+#show: project.with(
+  title: [Training: Listening],
+  seminar: [English Q2],
+  show-outline: true,
+  author: "Erik Grobecker",
+  date: datetime(day: 6, month: 2, year: 2025),
+)
+
+#show "->": sym.arrow
+#show "=>": sym.arrow.double
+
+
+- #link("https://learnenglishteens.britishcouncil.org/skills/listening/c1-listening")[britishcouncil]
+
+= Mediation
+
+== writing a short speech
+// (Trying to see how far I can progress in a certain time)
+
+= Listening
+
++ nothing is more enjoyable, in her own world, like an artist
++ tought her how to cook, recipes, cooked with her since she was five
++ really think about her dream, sacrifices, being a normal kid
++ became her business partner, opens the shop while she's still in school, runs it during the day
++ diligence, great flavor
++ hard work, responsibility, awarness of customers
++ fresh foods, more extracts than sugar
+
+#pagebreak()
+
+= Writing
+
+== An article by David Brooks - "If it feels right ..."
+
+=== Summary
+
+The article "If it feels right...", 
+written by David Brooks and published by the New York Times on the 9th of september in 2011
+is about how young adults percieve right and wrong.
+Brook and his team asked questions in an empirical study, regarding these question of morality or ethics,
+after which they categorized their results.
+They found that most of the 230 people they interviewed, 
+to them, didn't have any ethical standing and just regarded it as a matter of individual opinion.
+The team then assumed teenagers, if given more ressources, would cultivate their moral intuitions.
+
+=== Destroying a point (lightly)
+
+A first point that can be used to critisize this very well made article by Mr. Brooks,
+would be the lacking dataset, 230 individuals interview is in any shape or form way ot lackluster to form any meaningfull conclusion,
+as the reiterate 230 young adults wouldn't even make up a single school, and with that can't be seen representation of an entire generation.
+
+Secondly, not only is Brook overstating the importance of how 230 people solved his survey,
+he is also judging this directly and comparing their thoughts with his, but also tries paint them in a negative light.\
+This is seen, when comparing he states that "moral thinking didn't enter the picture", regarding a way of thinking, which is not his own,
+as unmoral and as something that could be cultivated upon to the state which Brook sees as good.\
+Directly categorizing that morality is based on the percerption of an individual is by that quickly thrown into the bin of having a non-cultivated moral intuition,
+with no further description for why it should be seen as such.
+
+Thirdly, the article also uses negativly connoted words together with the "youth of today" almost like a clockwork,
+creating a dogmatic impression to readers, which they would then apply to many of a generation.
+An example of such writing can be seen in the "#underline[depressing]" result, "#underline[groping] to say anything sensible" or the "#underline[rambling] answers"